South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per

South Africa
0.0007 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0007 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
113th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0.0010.0010.0020.002200520142023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0007 units per square kilometre against 0.0007 units per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 186 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre 0.001 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0007 units per square kilometre against 0.0007 units per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
South Africa ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.