How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?

19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) … square

Hong Kong

0.0394 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.0242 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Hong Kong rank

4th

Rwanda rank

7th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) … square over time

Hong Kong
Rwanda

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0394 units per square kilometre against 0.0242 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0152 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.6 times Rwanda's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 186 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0794 units per square kilometre	0.0183 units per square kilometre	0.0611 units per square kilometre	Hong Kong
2010s	0.0524 units per square kilometre	0.0224 units per square kilometre	0.03 units per square kilometre	Hong Kong
2020s	0.086 units per square kilometre	0.0231 units per square kilometre	0.0628 units per square kilometre	Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Hong Kong or Rwanda?: Hong Kong, at 0.0394 units per square kilometre against 0.0242 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Hong Kong and Rwanda?: 0.0152 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?: Hong Kong ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed: 26 August 2026

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.