Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per

Hong Kong, China
0.0394 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0334 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
Malta rank
5th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Malta
00.0250.050.0750.10.125200520142023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0394 units per square kilometre against 0.0334 units per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.006 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Malta ranks 5th of 186 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0794 units per square kilometre 0.0076 units per square kilometre 0.0718 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.0524 units per square kilometre 0.0218 units per square kilometre 0.0306 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.086 units per square kilometre 0.0301 units per square kilometre 0.0559 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Hong Kong, China or Malta?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.0394 units per square kilometre against 0.0334 units per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
0.006 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Malta ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.