Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Pakistan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0.0011 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.0012 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
96th
Pakistan rank
93rd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Pakistan
0.0010.0010.002200520142023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0012 units per square kilometre against 0.0011 units per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0012 units per square kilometre against 0.0011 units per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Pakistan?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Pakistan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Pakistan rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Pakistan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/pakistan/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Pakistan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.