China vs Palestine: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) … square

China
0.0034 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.0036 units per square kilometre
in 2022
China rank
56th
Palestine rank
54th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) … square over time

  • China
  • Palestine
00.0020.0040.006200520142023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0036 units per square kilometre against 0.0034 units per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0002 units per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China ahead.

China ranks 56th and Palestine ranks 54th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0037 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0036 units per square kilometre 0.0039 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Palestine
2020s 0.0036 units per square kilometre 0.0034 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, China or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0036 units per square kilometre against 0.0034 units per square kilometre in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between China and Palestine?
0.0002 units per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Palestine?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do China and Palestine rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
China ranks 56th and Palestine ranks 54th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Palestine: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/china/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/china/west-bank-and-gaza/">China vs Palestine: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.