China vs Ireland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per

China
0.0034 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
0.003 units per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
56th
Ireland rank
59th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time

  • China
  • Ireland
00.0010.0020.0030.004200520142023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0034 units per square kilometre against 0.003 units per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.0004 units per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 56th and Ireland ranks 59th of 186 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0037 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0036 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre 0.0013 units per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0035 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, China or Ireland?
China, at 0.0034 units per square kilometre against 0.003 units per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between China and Ireland?
0.0004 units per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ireland?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do China and Ireland rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
China ranks 56th and Ireland ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ireland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/china/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/china/ireland/">China vs Ireland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.