Australia vs Botswana: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per

Australia
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
169th
Botswana rank
172nd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time

  • Australia
  • Botswana
0000200520142023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 169th and Botswana ranks 172nd of 186 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Australia or Botswana?
Australia, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Australia and Botswana?
0 units per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
Australia ranks 169th and Botswana ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Botswana: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/">Australia vs Botswana: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.