Australia vs Bhutan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per

Australia
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
169th
Bhutan rank
167th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time

  • Australia
  • Bhutan
00000200520142023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.

Australia ranks 169th and Bhutan ranks 167th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bhutan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Australia or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Australia and Bhutan?
0 units per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
Australia ranks 169th and Bhutan ranks 167th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bhutan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/australia/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/australia/bhutan/">Australia vs Bhutan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.