Finland vs Zambia: Time-related underemployment (current ILO definition - ICLS19)
Time-related underemployment (current ILO definition - ICLS19) over time
- Finland
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 218.15 against 216.27 in Finland, a difference of 1.88.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Zambia ahead.
Finland ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 20th of 59 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 149.21 | 175.38 | 26.17 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 180.86 | 180.49 | 0.3722 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (current ilo definition - icls19), Finland or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 218.15 against 216.27 in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (current ilo definition - icls19) between Finland and Zambia?
- 1.88, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Zambia rank globally for time-related underemployment (current ilo definition - icls19)?
- Finland ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 20th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (current ILO definition - ICLS19) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series includes only countries for which the 19th ICLS definitions are applied. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database description.