China vs Slovenia: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals

China
3.26 0-6 scale
in 2012
Slovenia
2.08 0-6 scale
in 2025
China rank
3rd
Slovenia rank
5th

Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals over time

  • China
  • Slovenia
0123200820162025

How they compare

China currently reports 3.26 0-6 scale against 2.08 0-6 scale in Slovenia, a difference of 1.18 0-6 scale.

That makes China's figure about 1.6 times Slovenia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 5th of 41 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.26 0-6 scale 2.65 0-6 scale 0.6071 0-6 scale China
2010s 3.26 0-6 scale 2.62 0-6 scale 0.6389 0-6 scale China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals, China or Slovenia?
China, at 3.26 0-6 scale against 2.08 0-6 scale in Slovenia as of 2012.
What is the difference in strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals between China and Slovenia?
1.18 0-6 scale, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Slovenia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
How do China and Slovenia rank globally for strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals?
China ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 5th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals (regular contracts). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Slovenia: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-individual-dismissals-regular-contracts/china/slovenia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-individual-dismissals-regular-contracts/china/slovenia-2/">China vs Slovenia: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals (regular contracts)
Unit
0-6 scale
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
50 places, 1,336 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD indicators of employment protection are synthetic indicators of the strictness of regulation on dismissals and the use of temporary contracts. For each year, indicators refer to regulation in force on the 1st of January. For more information and full methodology, see OECD Indicators of Employment Protection webpage Last data update: May 2022 OECD statistics contact: ELS.Contact@oecd.org