Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of

Asia and the Pacific
16.12
in 2025
Belarus
18.94
in 2024
Asia and the Pacific rank
9th
Belarus rank
11th

SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of over time

  • Asia and the Pacific
  • Belarus
05101520200020122025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 18.94 against 16.12 in Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 2.82.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Asia and the Pacific's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific ranks 9th and Belarus ranks 11th of 87 groups.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific Belarus Difference Ahead
2010s 16.67 18.39 1.72 Belarus
2020s 16.24 18.24 2 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 9.2.2: manufacturing employment as a proportion of, Asia and the Pacific or Belarus?
Belarus, at 18.94 against 16.12 in Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 9.2.2: manufacturing employment as a proportion of between Asia and the Pacific and Belarus?
2.82, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific and Belarus?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Asia and the Pacific and Belarus rank globally for sdg indicator 9.2.2: manufacturing employment as a proportion of?
Asia and the Pacific ranks 9th and Belarus ranks 11th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-9-2-2-manufacturing-employment-as-a-proportion-of-total-employment-previous/asia-and-the-pacific/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-9-2-2-manufacturing-employment-as-a-proportion-of-total-employment-previous/asia-and-the-pacific/belarus/">Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
243 places, 5,043 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. This indicator conveys the share of employment in manufacturing. Employment in manufacturing is defined based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Employment refers to all persons of working age who, during a specified brief period, were in paid employment (whether at work or with a job but not at work) or in self-employment (whether at work or with an enterprise but not at work). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and economic activity. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.