Cuba vs East Timor: SDG indicator 8.5.2: Unemployment rate … previous ICLS13 15+
SDG indicator 8.5.2: Unemployment rate … previous ICLS13 15+ over time
- Cuba
- East Timor
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.7 against 1.54 in East Timor, a difference of 0.16.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 165th and East Timor ranks 168th of 179 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.93 | 5.44 | 2.51 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 2.55 | 3.92 | 1.37 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.5.2: unemployment rate (previous ilo definition), Cuba or East Timor?
- Cuba, at 1.7 against 1.54 in East Timor as of 2018.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.5.2: unemployment rate (previous ilo definition) between Cuba and East Timor?
- 0.16, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Cuba and East Timor rank globally for sdg indicator 8.5.2: unemployment rate (previous ilo definition)?
- Cuba ranks 165th and East Timor ranks 168th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.5.2: Unemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The unemployment rate conveys the number of persons who are unemployed as a percent of the labour force (i.e., the employed plus the unemployed). The unemployed comprise all persons of working age who were: a) without work during the reference period, i.e. were not in paid employment or self-employment; b) currently available for work, i.e. were available for paid employment or self-employment during the reference period; and c) seeking work, i.e. had taken specific steps in a specified recent period to seek paid employment or self-employment. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.