Japan vs Netherlands: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by

Japan
52.93
in 2025
Netherlands
69.16
in 2025
Japan rank
24th
Netherlands rank
22nd

Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by over time

  • Japan
  • Netherlands
050100150199020072025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 69.16 against 52.93 in Japan, a difference of 16.23.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.3 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Netherlands ahead.

Japan ranks 24th and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 24 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 113.9 99.37 14.53 Japan
2000s 97.01 101 3.98 Netherlands
2010s 86.14 91.72 5.58 Netherlands
2020s 62.51 74.12 11.62 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by, Japan or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 69.16 against 52.93 in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by between Japan and Netherlands?
16.23, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Netherlands?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Japan and Netherlands rank globally for real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by?
Japan ranks 24th and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 24 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by relative unit labor costs (advanced economies only). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Netherlands: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-reer-index-2010-100-adjusted-by-relative-unit-labor-costs/japan/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-reer-index-2010-100-adjusted-by-relative-unit-labor-costs/japan/netherlands/">Japan vs Netherlands: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by relative unit labor costs (advanced economies only)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
25 places, 900 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The Effective Exchange Rate (EER) dataset includes annual, quarterly and monthly nominal and real effective exchange rates by economy. Nominal effective exchange rates (NEERs) measure the value of a country's currency in relation to a weighted average of the currency values of their major trading partners. Real effective exchange rates (REERs) adjust the NEER to account for a country's inflation rate in relation to the weighted inflation rate of their major trading partners. The IMF publishes NEERs and REERs for approximately 90 IMF member countries that account for the vast share of global international trade. These statistics help policymakers and analysts assess the competitiveness of a country's exports, monitor currency trends, evaluate the impact of exchange rate changes on trade flows, and inform decisions regarding monetary policy, exchange rate management, and international trade. The EERs are calculated by IMF staff using exchange rate information, consumer price indexes received from national authorities and international trade weights. These weights are calculated as three-year averages of annual data available from official sources on trade, tourism and manufacturing collected from the United Nations (UN), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), World Bank, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).