Saint Lucia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO)

Saint Lucia
28.6
in 2027
Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
25.15
in 2027
Saint Lucia rank
52nd
Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income rank
53rd

Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO) over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
0102030200520162027

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 28.6 against 25.15 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income, a difference of 3.45.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 52nd and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income Difference Ahead
2000s 24.79 24.98 0.194 Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
2010s 25.07 24.63 0.444 Saint Lucia
2020s 25.88 24.72 1.16 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64, Saint Lucia or Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income?
Saint Lucia, at 28.6 against 25.15 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 between Saint Lucia and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income?
3.45, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Saint Lucia and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income rank globally for ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64?
Saint Lucia ranks 52nd and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Lucia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/st-lucia/sub-saharan-africa-low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/st-lucia/sub-saharan-africa-low-income/">Saint Lucia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 is the total weekly hours worked by employed persons in their main job divided by the population aged 15-64. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.