Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income vs Guinea-Bissau: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO)

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
25.03
in 2027
Guinea-Bissau
28.61
in 2027
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income rank
54th
Guinea-Bissau rank
51st

Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO) over time

  • Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
  • Guinea-Bissau
0102030200520162027

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 28.61 against 25.03 in Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 3.58.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 54th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 51st of 87 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 23.95 26.85 2.9 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 23.86 27.02 3.17 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 24.26 28.22 3.96 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64, Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 28.61 against 25.03 in Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 between Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income and Guinea-Bissau?
3.58, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income and Guinea-Bissau?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64?
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 54th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 51st of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income vs Guinea-Bissau: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/europe-and-central-asia-upper-middle-income/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/europe-and-central-asia-upper-middle-income/guinea-bissau/">Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income vs Guinea-Bissau: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 is the total weekly hours worked by employed persons in their main job divided by the population aged 15-64. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.