Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO)

Equatorial Guinea
26.16
in 2027
Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income
17.76
in 2027
Equatorial Guinea rank
84th
Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income rank
81st

Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income
0102030200520162027

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 26.16 against 17.76 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income, a difference of 8.4.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 84th and Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income ranks 81st of 188 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 26.31 21.04 5.27 Equatorial Guinea
2010s 27.02 18.94 8.09 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 26.06 17.32 8.74 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64, Equatorial Guinea or Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income?
Equatorial Guinea, at 26.16 against 17.76 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 between Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income?
8.4, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income rank globally for ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 84th and Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income ranks 81st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/equatorial-guinea/sub-saharan-africa-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/equatorial-guinea/sub-saharan-africa-upper-middle-income/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Upper-middle income: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 is the total weekly hours worked by employed persons in their main job divided by the population aged 15-64. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.