Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs North Korea: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
33.17
in 2027
North Korea
39.64
in 2027
Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income rank
1st
North Korea rank
3rd

Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 over time

  • Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
  • North Korea
010203040200520162027

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 39.64 against 33.17 in Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 6.47.

That makes North Korea's figure about 1.2 times Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, North Korea has been ahead every year.

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 3rd of 87 groups.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income North Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 35.15 37.69 2.54 North Korea
2010s 34.86 38.04 3.18 North Korea
2020s 33.23 38.66 5.43 North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64, Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income or North Korea?
North Korea, at 39.64 against 33.17 in Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 between Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and North Korea?
6.47, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and North Korea?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and North Korea rank globally for ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64?
Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 3rd of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs North Korea: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/eastern-asia-upper-middle-income/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/eastern-asia-upper-middle-income/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs North Korea: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 is the total weekly hours worked by employed persons in their main job divided by the population aged 15-64. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.