Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Guam: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO)

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
23.44
in 2027
Guam
27.45
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
68th
Guam rank
68th

Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Guam
0102030200520162027

How they compare

Guam currently reports 27.45 against 23.44 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income, a difference of 4.01.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.2 times Asia and the Pacific: Low income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Asia and the Pacific: Low income ahead.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 68th and Guam ranks 68th of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Asia and the Pacific: Low income averaged higher in 2 and Guam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Guam Difference Ahead
2000s 28.47 23.82 4.65 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2010s 27.47 24.86 2.61 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2020s 24.03 26.4 2.37 Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64, Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Guam?
Guam, at 27.45 against 23.44 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Guam?
4.01, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Guam?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Guam rank globally for ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 68th and Guam ranks 68th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Guam: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-of-total-weekly-hours-worked-to-population-aged-15-64-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/guam/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Guam: Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 is the total weekly hours worked by employed persons in their main job divided by the population aged 15-64. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.