Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square

Jamaica
0.1297 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Liechtenstein
0.1229 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
43rd
Liechtenstein rank
45th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square over time

  • Jamaica
  • Liechtenstein
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.1297 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1229 1000 No per square kilometre in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.0068 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Liechtenstein's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 43rd and Liechtenstein ranks 45th of 191 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0783 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0574 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0209 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.0897 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0712 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0185 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.1024 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0832 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0192 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.1133 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0956 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0177 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.1226 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1063 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.1279 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1154 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0125 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.1297 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1216 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 No per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square, Jamaica or Liechtenstein?
Jamaica, at 0.1297 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1229 1000 No per square kilometre in Liechtenstein as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square between Jamaica and Liechtenstein?
0.0068 1000 No per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Liechtenstein?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Liechtenstein rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square?
Jamaica ranks 43rd and Liechtenstein ranks 45th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/liechtenstein/">Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.