Guatemala vs Kiribati: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square

Guatemala
0.0839 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0.0793 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
62nd
Kiribati rank
63rd

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kiribati
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0839 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0793 1000 No per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Guatemala ranks 62nd and Kiribati ranks 63rd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0225 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0323 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
1970s 0.0287 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0366 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 0.0365 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0405 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 0.0474 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0489 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 0.0601 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0586 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0733 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0694 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0821 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0772 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square, Guatemala or Kiribati?
Guatemala, at 0.0839 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0793 1000 No per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square between Guatemala and Kiribati?
0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Kiribati rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square?
Guatemala ranks 62nd and Kiribati ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kiribati: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/">Guatemala vs Kiribati: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.