Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square

Faroe Islands
0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0201 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
143rd

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Zimbabwe
0.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0201 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.

Faroe Islands ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 191 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0136 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 0.0151 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 0.0169 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0107 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.0168 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.0177 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0153 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.0182 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0175 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 0.0203 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0196 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square, Faroe Islands or Zimbabwe?
Faroe Islands, at 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0201 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square between Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square?
Faroe Islands ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/zimbabwe/">Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.