Faroe Islands vs Mozambique: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square

Faroe Islands
0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
142nd
Mozambique rank
141st

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Mozambique
0.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 142nd and Mozambique ranks 141st of 191 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0136 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 0.0151 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0092 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 0.0169 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0094 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.0168 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0094 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.0177 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0123 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.0182 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 0.0203 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0198 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square, Faroe Islands or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square between Faroe Islands and Mozambique?
0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Mozambique rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square?
Faroe Islands ranks 142nd and Mozambique ranks 141st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Mozambique: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-male-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/mozambique/">Faroe Islands vs Mozambique: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.