Botswana vs Suriname: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square

Botswana
0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.002 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
183rd
Suriname rank
186th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
0.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Botswana ranks 183rd and Suriname ranks 186th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0 1000 No per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square, Botswana or Suriname?
Botswana, at 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square between Botswana and Suriname?
0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square?
Botswana ranks 183rd and Suriname ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-female-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-female-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.