China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP

China
51,886
in 2027
Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
6,313
in 2027
China rank
84th
Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income rank
86th

Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP over time

  • China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199120092027

How they compare

China currently reports 51,886 against 6,313 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income, a difference of 45,573.

That makes China's figure about 8.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ahead.

China ranks 84th and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ranks 86th of 188 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income Difference Ahead
1990s 5,099 3,209 1,890 China
2000s 11,502 3,596 7,907 China
2010s 26,627 4,851 21,776 China
2020s 44,382 5,809 38,573 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp, China or Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income?
China, at 51,886 against 6,313 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp between China and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income?
45,573, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do China and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp?
China ranks 84th and Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ranks 86th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021-international-at-ppp-ilo-modelled-estimates/china/sub-saharan-africa-low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021-international-at-ppp-ilo-modelled-estimates/china/sub-saharan-africa-low-income/">China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP (in constant 2021 international dollars at PPP) derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.