Australia vs Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP

Australia
120,064
in 2027
Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
86,885
in 2027
Australia rank
26th
Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income rank
23rd

Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP over time

  • Australia
  • Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k199120092027

How they compare

Australia currently reports 120,064 against 86,885 in Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 33,179.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 26th and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 23rd of 188 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 85,613 30,195 55,418 Australia
2000s 100,013 44,050 55,963 Australia
2010s 110,040 62,433 47,607 Australia
2020s 115,821 79,494 36,327 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp, Australia or Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income?
Australia, at 120,064 against 86,885 in Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp between Australia and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income?
33,179, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Australia and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp?
Australia ranks 26th and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 23rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021-international-at-ppp-ilo-modelled-estimates/australia/central-and-western-asia-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021-international-at-ppp-ilo-modelled-estimates/australia/central-and-western-asia-upper-middle-income/">Australia vs Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP (in constant 2021 international dollars at PPP) derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.