Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Eswatini: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
5,787
in 2027
Eswatini
49,399
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
87th
Eswatini rank
90th

Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Eswatini
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199120092027

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 49,399 against 5,787 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income, a difference of 43,612.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 8.5 times Asia and the Pacific: Low income's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 90th of 87 groups.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 4,366 25,297 20,931 Eswatini
2000s 4,884 31,304 26,420 Eswatini
2010s 6,378 38,044 31,667 Eswatini
2020s 5,808 47,018 41,210 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp, Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 49,399 against 5,787 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Eswatini?
43,612, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Eswatini?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Eswatini rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2021 international $ at ppp?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 90th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Eswatini: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021-international-at-ppp-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021-international-at-ppp-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/eswatini/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Eswatini: Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP (in constant 2021 international dollars at PPP) derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.