What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa?

119,280, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa?

7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Angola

5,247

in 2025

Sub-Saharan Africa

124,527

in 2027

Angola rank

9th

Sub-Saharan Africa rank

11th

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

Angola
Sub-Saharan Africa

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 124,527 against 5,247 in Angola, a difference of 119,280.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 23.7 times Angola's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 11th of 79 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Sub-Saharan Africa	Difference	Ahead
2010s	4,799	101,888	97,089	Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s	5,270	112,841	107,571	Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Angola or Sub-Saharan Africa?: Sub-Saharan Africa, at 124,527 against 5,247 in Angola as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa?: 119,280, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
How do Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?: Angola ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 11th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/angola/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/angola/sub-saharan-africa/">Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source: International Labour Organization
Licence: ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage: 166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.