Belize vs Latvia: LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force
LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force over time
- Belize
- Latvia
How they compare
Belize currently reports 9.4 against 9.21 in Latvia, a difference of 0.19.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 36th of 89 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu3: combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force, Belize or Latvia?
- Belize, at 9.4 against 9.21 in Latvia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in lu3: combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force between Belize and Latvia?
- 0.19, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do Belize and Latvia rank globally for lu3: combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force?
- Belize ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 36th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU3 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment or the potential labour force. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.