South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates)

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
22,344
in 2027
Zimbabwe
7,268
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
72nd

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020082027

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income currently reports 22,344 against 7,268 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 15,076.

That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income's figure about 3.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 38 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income has been ahead every year.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 85 groups.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 12,884 3,991 8,893 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
2000s 15,439 4,749 10,690 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
2010s 18,926 5,347 13,579 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
2020s 21,577 6,534 15,043 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates), South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income or Zimbabwe?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income, at 22,344 against 7,268 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) between South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income and Zimbabwe?
15,076, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income and Zimbabwe?
38 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2027.
How do South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income and Zimbabwe rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates)?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 85 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/zimbabwe/">South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,464 data points, 1990–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The labour force is the sum of all persons of working age who are employed and those who are unemployed. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.