Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates)

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
27,815
in 2027
Zimbabwe
7,268
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
72nd

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k199020082027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: Low income currently reports 27,815 against 7,268 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 20,547.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: Low income's figure about 3.8 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: Low income has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 85 groups.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 17,423 3,991 13,432 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2000s 20,730 4,749 15,981 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2010s 24,998 5,347 19,650 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2020s 26,769 6,534 20,235 Asia and the Pacific: Low income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates), Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Zimbabwe?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income, at 27,815 against 7,268 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
20,547, with Asia and the Pacific: Low income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
38 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates)?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 85 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,464 data points, 1990–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The labour force is the sum of all persons of working age who are employed and those who are unemployed. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.