Eswatini vs Sudan: Labor participation rate, total
Labor participation rate, total over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 69.7% against 65.7% in Sudan, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 41st and Sudan ranks 44th of 52 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.2% | 61.6% | 5.6% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 68.7% | 64.6% | 4.1% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 69.7% | 65.7% | 4.0% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, total, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 69.7% against 65.7% in Sudan as of 2010.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, total between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 4.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for labor participation rate, total?
- Eswatini ranks 41st and Sudan ranks 44th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, total (% of total population ages 35-54). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 35-54 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.