Bulgaria vs Finland: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Bulgaria
- Finland
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 14.3% against 10.4% in Finland, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.4 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Finland ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 31st and Finland ranks 34th of 44 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.3% | 48.2% | 18.9% | Finland |
| 2020s | 15.5% | 15.2% | 0.2% | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Bulgaria or Finland?
- Bulgaria, at 14.3% against 10.4% in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Bulgaria and Finland?
- 3.9%, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Finland rank globally for informal employment?
- Bulgaria ranks 31st and Finland ranks 34th of 44 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment (% of total agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).