Cyprus vs Czechia: Informal employment, male
Informal employment, male over time
- Cyprus
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2.9% against 2.5% in Cyprus, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 42nd and Czechia ranks 40th of 45 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.5% | 20.6% | 9.1% | Czechia |
| 2020s | 4.6% | 13.6% | 9.0% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, male, Cyprus or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 2.9% against 2.5% in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment, male between Cyprus and Czechia?
- 0.4%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Czechia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Czechia rank globally for informal employment, male?
- Cyprus ranks 42nd and Czechia ranks 40th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, male (% of total male non-agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in non-agricultural activities out of total employment in non-agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises workers whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).