Chile vs Mongolia: Informal employment, male
Informal employment, male over time
- Chile
- Mongolia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 23.5% against 21.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 45 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.5% | 24.3% | 1.2% | Chile |
| 2020s | 24.6% | 24.6% | 0.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, male, Chile or Mongolia?
- Chile, at 23.5% against 21.7% in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment, male between Chile and Mongolia?
- 1.8%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Mongolia rank globally for informal employment, male?
- Chile ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, male (% of total male non-agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in non-agricultural activities out of total employment in non-agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises workers whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).