Armenia vs Uruguay: Informal employment, male
Informal employment, male over time
- Armenia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 32.0% against 26.4% in Armenia, a difference of 5.6%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 45 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.1% | 24.2% | 9.9% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 27.3% | 25.0% | 2.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, male, Armenia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 32.0% against 26.4% in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment, male between Armenia and Uruguay?
- 5.6%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for informal employment, male?
- Armenia ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, male (% of total male non-agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in non-agricultural activities out of total employment in non-agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises workers whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).