Angola vs Botswana: Informal employment, male
Informal employment, male over time
- Angola
- Botswana
How they compare
Angola currently reports 86.1% against 70.0% in Botswana, a difference of 16.1%.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 3rd of 45 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.8% | 65.5% | 1.3% | Angola |
| 2020s | 77.5% | 68.8% | 8.7% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, male, Angola or Botswana?
- Angola, at 86.1% against 70.0% in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment, male between Angola and Botswana?
- 16.1%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Botswana?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Botswana rank globally for informal employment, male?
- Angola ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 3rd of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, male (% of total male non-agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in non-agricultural activities out of total employment in non-agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises workers whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).