Mongolia vs Russia: Informal employment, female
Informal employment, female over time
- Mongolia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 17.5% against 16.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 17th and Russia ranks 15th of 45 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.8% | 16.1% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 16.1% | 0.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, female, Mongolia or Russia?
- Russia, at 17.5% against 16.1% in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment, female between Mongolia and Russia?
- 1.4%, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Russia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Russia rank globally for informal employment, female?
- Mongolia ranks 17th and Russia ranks 15th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, female (% of total female non-agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in non-agricultural activities out of total employment in non-agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises workers whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).