Lithuania vs Moldova: Informal employment, female
Informal employment, female over time
- Lithuania
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 4.4% against 4.1% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 30th and Moldova ranks 28th of 45 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 6.6% | 5.8% | Moldova |
| 2020s | 3.2% | 4.2% | 1.0% | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, female, Lithuania or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 4.4% against 4.1% in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment, female between Lithuania and Moldova?
- 0.3%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Moldova?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Moldova rank globally for informal employment, female?
- Lithuania ranks 30th and Moldova ranks 28th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, female (% of total female non-agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in non-agricultural activities out of total employment in non-agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises workers whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).