Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Informal care employment rate
Informal care employment rate over time
- Ecuador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 33.41 against 32.21 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.2.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 24th of 43 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.67 | 37.92 | 10.25 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 31.61 | 34.38 | 2.77 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment rate, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
- Ecuador, at 33.41 against 32.21 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment rate between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 1.2, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for informal care employment rate?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 24th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.