Brunei vs Mongolia: Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Brunei
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 9.41 against 7.37 in Brunei, a difference of 2.04.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Brunei's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Brunei has been ahead every year.
Brunei ranks 39th and Mongolia ranks 38th of 43 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.03 | 6.39 | 4.65 | Brunei |
| 2020s | 10.32 | 5.19 | 5.13 | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Brunei or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 9.41 against 7.37 in Brunei as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Brunei and Mongolia?
- 2.04, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Mongolia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Brunei and Mongolia rank globally for informal care employment?
- Brunei ranks 39th and Mongolia ranks 38th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.