Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mongolia: Informal care employment
Informal care employment over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 9.41 against 3.38 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 6.03.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.8 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 40th and Mongolia ranks 38th of 43 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.99 | 4.11 | 0.8737 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 5.61 | 5.64 | 0.0222 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 5.59 | 5.89 | 0.3005 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal care employment, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 9.41 against 3.38 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal care employment between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia?
- 6.03, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia rank globally for informal care employment?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 40th and Mongolia ranks 38th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Informal care employment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.