Lithuania vs United States: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition

Lithuania
1,366 Persons
in 2025
United States
134,927 Persons
in 2025
Lithuania rank
8th
United States rank
2nd

Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition over time

  • Lithuania
  • United States
050.0k100.0k150.0k197620002025

How they compare

United States currently reports 134,927 Persons against 1,366 Persons in Lithuania, a difference of 133,561 Persons.

That makes United States's figure about 98.8 times Lithuania's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 8th and United States ranks 2nd of 11 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania United States Difference Ahead
1990s 1,321 Persons 109,253 Persons 107,932 Persons United States
2000s 1,279 Persons 115,842 Persons 114,563 Persons United States
2010s 1,207 Persons 120,450 Persons 119,242 Persons United States
2020s 1,320 Persons 130,823 Persons 129,503 Persons United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on national definition, Lithuania or United States?
United States, at 134,927 Persons against 1,366 Persons in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on national definition between Lithuania and United States?
133,561 Persons, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and United States?
28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and United States rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on national definition?
Lithuania ranks 8th and United States ranks 2nd of 11 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs United States: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/lithuania-2/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/lithuania-2/united-states/">Lithuania vs United States: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains data on full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total). National definitions of part-time work vary considerably across OECD countries. Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker’s perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker’s perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent’s perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. Other factors as well affect the international comparability of the estimates. In some countries, the hours’ cut-off is based on hours for the main job, in others on total hours for all jobs. Certain countries do not consider unpaid family workers to be employed unless they work more than a minimum number of hours, so that such workers do not enter into counts for part-time workers. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.