Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income vs Uganda: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates)

Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
66.18
in 2027
Uganda
77.97
in 2027
Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income rank
6th
Uganda rank
9th

Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
  • Uganda
020406080199120092027

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 77.97 against 66.18 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income, a difference of 11.79.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ranks 6th and Uganda ranks 9th of 87 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 72.74 71.31 1.44 Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
2000s 72.38 71.76 0.6257 Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income
2010s 69.3 73.54 4.24 Uganda
2020s 66.07 77.33 11.26 Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates), Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income or Uganda?
Uganda, at 77.97 against 66.18 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates) between Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income and Uganda?
11.79, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income and Uganda?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income and Uganda rank globally for employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates)?
Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income ranks 6th and Uganda ranks 9th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income vs Uganda: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-to-population-ratio-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/sub-saharan-africa-low-income/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-to-population-ratio-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/sub-saharan-africa-low-income/uganda/">Sub-Saharan Africa: Low income vs Uganda: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The employment-to-population ratio is the number of persons who are employed as a percent of the total of working-age population. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.