Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Timor-Leste: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates)

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
60.64
in 2027
Timor-Leste
66.34
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
26th
Timor-Leste rank
29th

Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
  • Timor-Leste
020406080199120092027

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 66.34 against 60.64 in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, a difference of 5.7.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ahead.

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 26th and Timor-Leste ranks 29th of 87 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income averaged higher in 3 and Timor-Leste in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 71.81 69.04 2.76 Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2000s 67.33 66.88 0.4467 Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2010s 64.74 64.62 0.1144 Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2020s 61.63 65.52 3.89 Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates), Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 66.34 against 60.64 in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates) between Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Timor-Leste?
5.7, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Timor-Leste?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Timor-Leste rank globally for employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates)?
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 26th and Timor-Leste ranks 29th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Timor-Leste: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-to-population-ratio-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-to-population-ratio-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/timor-leste/">Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Timor-Leste: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The employment-to-population ratio is the number of persons who are employed as a percent of the total of working-age population. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.