Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates)

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
53.29
in 2027
Zimbabwe
61.51
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
61st

Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Zimbabwe
0204060199120092027

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 61.51 against 53.29 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income, a difference of 8.22.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Asia and the Pacific: Low income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Asia and the Pacific: Low income ahead.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 87 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Asia and the Pacific: Low income averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 67.26 62.76 4.5 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2000s 64.98 62.32 2.66 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2010s 62.05 62.23 0.1776 Zimbabwe
2020s 54.77 60.51 5.75 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates), Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 61.51 against 53.29 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates) between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
8.22, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for employment-to-population ratio (ilo modelled estimates)?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-to-population-ratio-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-to-population-ratio-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The employment-to-population ratio is the number of persons who are employed as a percent of the total of working-age population. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.