Brazil vs Korea: Employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — Dependent employment

Brazil
13.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2024
Korea
12.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Brazil rank
3rd
Korea rank
1st

Employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — Dependent employment over time

  • Brazil
  • Korea
05101520200120132025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 13.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 12.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Korea, a difference of 0.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Korea ahead.

Brazil ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 1st of 33 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 14.22 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 18.49 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 4.26 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Korea
2010s 12.64 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 14.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 1.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Korea
2020s 12.46 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 13.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 0.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — dependent employment, Brazil or Korea?
Brazil, at 13.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 12.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — dependent employment between Brazil and Korea?
0.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Korea?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Korea rank globally for employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — dependent employment?
Brazil ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 1st of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — Dependent employment tenure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Korea: Employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — Dependent employment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-job-tenure-intervals-frequency-dependent-employment-tenure/brazil/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-job-tenure-intervals-frequency-dependent-employment-tenure/brazil/korea/">Brazil vs Korea: Employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — Dependent employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment by job tenure intervals - frequency — Dependent employment tenure
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
46 places, 1,267 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains the tenure composition (as a percentage of all job tenures) by job tenure intervals. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment – sex, five-year and broad age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 15-64, total, etc.). Job tenure is measured by the length of time workers have been in their current or main job or with their current employer. This information is valuable for estimating the degree of fluidity in the labour market and in identifying the areas of economic activity where the turnover of labour is rapid or otherwise. Data are so far reported for a number of European countries and will be expanded to cover a greater number of countries. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. Information for all countries and all LFS subjects may be found in the attached file LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.