Afghanistan vs Eswatini: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- Afghanistan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1.7% against 1.6% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 163rd and Eswatini ranks 165th of 187 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 3.1% | 3.0% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 3.0% | 2.9% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 2.7% | 1.5% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), Afghanistan or Eswatini?
- Afghanistan, at 1.7% against 1.6% in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between Afghanistan and Eswatini?
- 0.1%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Eswatini rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- Afghanistan ranks 163rd and Eswatini ranks 165th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).