Turkey vs Zimbabwe: Employers, female (% of female employment)
Turkey
1.7%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1.7%
in 2025
Turkey rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
110th
Employers, female (% of female employment) over time
- Turkey
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 1.7% against 1.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Turkey ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 187 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkey | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8% | 1.9% | 1.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 1.9% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, female (% of female employment), Turkey or Zimbabwe?
- Turkey, at 1.7% against 1.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, female (% of female employment) between Turkey and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Turkey and Zimbabwe rank globally for employers, female (% of female employment)?
- Turkey ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).