Liberia vs Mauritius: Employers, female (% of female employment)
Liberia
1.0%
in 2025
Mauritius
1.0%
in 2025
Liberia rank
142nd
Mauritius rank
144th
Employers, female (% of female employment) over time
- Liberia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.
Liberia ranks 142nd and Mauritius ranks 144th of 187 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 1.4% | 0.5% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, female (% of female employment), Liberia or Mauritius?
- Liberia, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, female (% of female employment) between Liberia and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Liberia and Mauritius rank globally for employers, female (% of female employment)?
- Liberia ranks 142nd and Mauritius ranks 144th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).