East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs New Zealand: Employers, female (% of female employment)

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2.4%
in 2025
New Zealand
4.1%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
22nd
New Zealand rank
21st

Employers, female (% of female employment) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • New Zealand
1234199120082025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 4.1% against 2.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 1.7%.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 21st of 47 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 1.3% 4.4% 3.0% New Zealand
2000s 1.7% 4.1% 2.4% New Zealand
2010s 2.0% 3.9% 1.9% New Zealand
2020s 2.3% 4.0% 1.7% New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employers, female (% of female employment), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 4.1% against 2.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in employers, female (% of female employment) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and New Zealand?
1.7%, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and New Zealand rank globally for employers, female (% of female employment)?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 21st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs New Zealand: Employers, female (% of female employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employers-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employers-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/new-zealand/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs New Zealand: Employers, female (% of female employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).